Friday, August 28, 2015

Planned Parenthood Propaganda: Debunking the 3% Myth

Planned Parenthood and its supporters love to tout the “Abortions are only 3% of what they do” myth.  You only need a simple understanding of math to know that this is blatant propaganda. 

First of all, Planned Parenthood sees about 2.3 million people annually (men, pregnant women, and non-pregnant women).  They perform about 330,000 abortions annually.  Just looking at this figure, we already know that 14% of their clientele receive abortions. 

But keep in mind, not all of their clientele is female, and not all of their female clientele is pregnant.  So let’s just pretend (since we don’t know this figure) that 500,000 of their clientele consists of pregnant women.  With this figure, 66% of their pregnant clientele receive abortions.  There is of course a chance that the amount of pregnant women going to Planned Parenthood is right around 330,000…..  We don’t know the amount of pregnant women they see annually.

Here’s a quick example of misleading math, and the root of the 3% propaganda figure:

Let’s just say that an abortion clinic sees 100 people per year. 

70 of those people are men and non-pregnant women.

30 of those people are pregnant women.   

Each of those 30 pregnant women receives 10 services each in relation to getting an abortion (doctor’s visit, pregnancy test, consultation, abortion, follow-up, etc.).  So 30 abortions is considered 300 services.

The other 70 people receive 10 services each (birth control, STD tests, other tests, doctor’s visits, etc.).  The amount of services for those 70 people equals 700. 

So with this example, this abortion clinic sees 100 people per year.  They do 1,000 services per year.  Among those services are 30 abortions.  So they can say that 3% of their services are abortions, even though in this example, 30% of their clientele (100% of their pregnant clientele) got abortions….

Propaganda for this clinic will proudly proclaim that abortions are only 3% of what they do.  And a willingly ignorant public eats it up.  But when you look at the actual numbers in this example, you understand the truth.  This abortion clinic isn’t performing abortions for 3 people, as they lead an ignorant public to believe.  They are performing abortions for 30 people (100% of their pregnant clientele).  That’s a huge distortion that most Americans don’t get.

Best analogies I’ve heard on Planned Parenthood's distortion of numbers, from Rich Lowry:

"The sponsors of the New York City Marathon could count each small cup of water they hand out (some 2 million cups, compared with 45,000 runners) and say they are mainly in the hydration business.

Or Major League Baseball teams could say that they sell about 20 million hot dogs and play 2,430 games in a season, so baseball is only .012 percent of what they do."

But with profits around $60 million annually, why would a tax-payer funded organization want to run around saying that they kill 66% of their pregnant clientele’s babies?  That doesn’t sound very appealing.  However, with the lack of any national response to the recent undercover videos, I doubt the American public would bat an eye with Planned Parenthood’s real statistics.  In fact, our morally depraved society would probably prefer something closer to the 66% figure.  

Planned Parenthood should just scream from the rooftops their real statistics, as well as admit they sell baby parts for profit.  In doing so, they would receive a pat on the back from the Liberal left, and a "God bless Planned Parenthood" from our current President.

Monday, August 10, 2015

Go Home, Donald Trump. You're Drunk.

Donald Trump is like that new boyfriend that seems so great in the beginning, says all the things you've been longing to hear, and then 3 weeks into the relationship you find out he's married and lives in his parent's basement with his family of 8.

For a while there, people like me were cautiously excited to have a Republican Presidential candidate that seemed to have a spine, didn't take any guff from the media, and doubled down instead of backing down.  We have waited a long time for someone in our party who stands firm with their beliefs and doesn't apologize for those beliefs.  And while Donald Trump is the last person we would have wanted or expected, he seemed to show up at a time when people wanted and needed his blunt persona.

However, Trump showed his true colors at the first debate, in an environment he could not control.  Trump is not what we wanted.  He's not what we all had hoped for.  He is a wolf in wolf's clothing.  He is barely Republican, much less Conservative.  His incredibly liberal past is problematic.  His motives for being in the race are now questionable at best, selfish and malicious at worst. 

A third party run would be devastating to the Republicans' chances, which he knows.  I firmly believe his lead won't last, and then he'll start his third party run.  If he does that, it assures another Liberal president, and more problems for America.  So why don't all Republicans see this?  What is going on here? 

I'm confused as to why he still has support.  His blunt personality was refreshing for a little while.  But in reality, his bluntness is born of a crass narcissism and a lack of any intelligent, original thoughts.  He speaks forcefully, not intelligently.  He speaks in sound bites, and when pressed for more, he is combative and not articulate.  From what I have seen, he lacks any ability to debate an issue and back up his statements.  Maybe you can go to his website and it's all clear there, but I have yet to see an interview or a debate answer that demonstrates he has any depth or ability to discuss issues. 

He didn't even show any wit during the debate.  When he was asked about some comment he made about a woman on her knees, at the very least, a witty reply would have been to reference Bill Clinton - a former President skilled in the art of taking advantage of women in actions, not just words... But no, Trump couldn't even be witty.  He was unable to turn things back around on the moderators during questions he felt were unfair.  And this was Fox - what will happen with CNN moderators?  I'm so disappointed to see someone with zero debate skills, zero ability to articulate his ideas, and zero wit come out of the debate and still be in the lead. 

I get it on some level - people are fed up with the media and they thought Trump was hit with more gotcha questions than the others.  But come on, if you go around using derogatory language about women (and men) time after time, it's relevant to bring it up on a national stage.  Whatever the context was for each instance (from what I understand, most instances were Trump firing back at people that insulted him first), the fact remains that Trump responds with knee-jerk name calling.  It's good to know that about him. 

We can't have a President who acts so childish.  A President must have some class, maturity, and decorum.  Trump has none of those qualities.  And Conservatives, the party of family values, should not want a President that would be put in time-out if it was an elementary school and not the international stage.  Is he 100% someone you would want your kids to look up to and emulate?

To be clear though - I'm more offended by Obama's and Hillary's actions than by Trump's words.  By far.  My desire to bring America back from the edge is why I'm now being so critical of Donald Trump.  We can't go around saying that at least our guy isn't as bad as theirs.  We should want to say that our guy (or woman) is a hundred times better on every level than their candidate.

Trump has served a purpose.  He showed the other candidates that your popularity grows when you don't back down.  He has shown them that you shouldn't play by the media's rules all the time.  And he has shined a spotlight on matters that the American people care about and are angry about.  His polls should prove to other candidates that we are tired of the bought and paid for establishment political class.  But that's about it. 

I don't trust Donald Trump, and I don't respect him.  Can you, as a Conservative, truly get behind a man with such a liberal background, such a childish mentality, and such poor communication?  I hope your answer is no.  We need strength and character in our next President, and we need our next President to be Conservative.  For those reasons, Donald Trump must go.